Artificial intelligence is already among us Brazilians. And it is not a timid adoption: according to a recent survey by HSR Specialist Researchers, exclusively released by \u00c9poca NEG\u00d3CIOS, more than 801% of young people between 18 and 34 years old in Brazil already use generative AI tools. This could be great news \u2013 after all, the rapid adoption of emerging technologies is usually an indicator of a country's dynamism and innovative potential.<\/p>\n
But the data reveals a paradox that deeply concerns me as someone who has followed the evolution of the Brazilian innovation ecosystem for decades: we are adopting quickly, yes, but in a profoundly unequal way.<\/p>\n
The numbers are revealing: while 95% from class A already use generative AI tools, only 61% from classes C2, D and E have had this opportunity. Education also draws a clear line: 80% of people with a higher education degree use AI, compared to only 31% of those with a high school degree.<\/p>\n
This is not just a question of access to technology. As the HSR research<\/a>, there is a fundamental difference in the perception of capacity: \u201cThe upper classes have the perception that they will be able to learn and master technology, which is not so true for the lower classes.\u201d<\/p>\n This is the real digital divide we face: not just unequal access, but inequality in trust and perceived mastery of these tools.<\/p>\n While we deal with our internal challenges, the global scenario continues to evolve. The European Union, traditionally seen as a regulatory force, has just taken a bold step: it announced investments of 200 billion euros in AI, seeking to position itself as the third major global hub in technology, alongside the US and China.<\/p>\n The European shift is strategic and well-calculated. At the AI Action Summit in France, Europe laid out a plan that goes beyond simple regulation \u2013 it wants to stimulate innovation in a range of industries, from pure technology to industrial and aerospace.<\/p>\n The contrast with Brazil is worrying. As experts warn<\/a>, we run the risk of being \u201cswallowed up\u201d in this new global configuration. We do not have large technology companies, we depend on foreign regulations and, to make matters worse, we are not even close to solving our deep internal digital inequality.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve talked about this before: technological globalization has its winners and losers. The question is: do we really want to be in the latter group?<\/p>\n A fascinating aspect of this moment is how AI is infiltrating all sectors and for the most diverse audiences. Let's look at some recent examples:<\/p>\n From the food we eat to the games we play, from the way we travel to how we interact with machines \u2013 AI is reshaping everything. And each of these applications represents opportunities for business and innovation.<\/p>\n A recent highlight that deserves our attention is the emergence of Manus AI<\/a>, a new Chinese AI model that is gaining attention for dispensing with the use of complex prompts and focusing on automating creative processes and assisting in decision-making.<\/p>\n The launch of startup Butterfly Effect has already attracted two million people to its waiting list \u2013 a clear sign of the global appetite for increasingly accessible and intuitive AI solutions.<\/p>\n This case perfectly illustrates how China remains firmly in the race for leadership in AI, now focusing also on user experience and not just the raw capacity of the models.<\/p>\n As AI advances, so does the debate about its impact on the job market. A recent analysis by State<\/a> brings up an important point: it is not AI itself that dehumanizes work, but how we choose to implement it.<\/p>\n Technology can either replace professionals or enhance their capabilities. The path we follow depends on decisions we are making now \u2013 in companies, public policies and educational institutions.<\/p>\n In my work with startups and corporations, I have consistently argued that we need to think about augmented intelligence, not replacement intelligence. It\u2019s about enhancing what humans do best through technology, not about replacing people with algorithms.<\/p>\nEurope reinvents itself while Brazil hesitates<\/h2>\n
AI is everywhere, for all audiences<\/h2>\n
\n
China\u2019s emergence as an AI powerhouse<\/h2>\n
The tension between innovation and human labor<\/h2>\n
The Battle for Copyright in the Age of AI<\/h2>\n